Task Library

Projects

Variable Difficulty List Memory Test

The Variable Difficulty List Memory Test (VLMT) is designed to assess verbal learning and recognition memory. In this task, participants are asked to read and learn a list of semantically-unrelated words that are presented simultaneously for 30-seconds. Following the learning portion of the task, participants are shown a series of words that include both target words (from the original list) and foil words (not from the list). For each word, participants are asked whether it was part of the original list by clicking "yes" or "no."

The Variable Difficulty List Memory Test is available in three different list-lengths: 6-target word version, 12-target word version, and 18-target word version. Each version has multiple alternative word lists, allowing for repeated administration to mitigate the potential confounding effects of item memorization across sessions. For example, the 12-word version of the test has 19 alternative word lists.

Customize:

  • Number of learning trials.
  • Delay of the recognition portion of the task (e.g., immediate, after another mobile cognitive task within the same session, at a different session later in the day or on another day).
  • Trial-by-trial feedback given to the participant (e.g., if their answer was correct or incorrect).
  • Summary feedback given to the participant (e.g., graphical representation of number correct)

Data collected:

  • Total number of correct responses given for the target words.
  • Total number of incorrect responses given for the target words.
  • Total number of correct responses (includes both target and foil words).
  • Total number of incorrect responses (includes both target and foil words).
  • Median and fastest reaction time (for the correct trials).

Get Started with Variable Difficulty List Memory Test

Ready to incorporate the Variable Difficulty List Memory Test into your research? Contact us today to learn how NeuroUX’s web-based Variable Difficulty List Memory Test can enhance your study design.

Validated:

This test has been validated in a general adult sample, older adults with and without MCI, and adults with serious mental illness. Additional details on the creation of this task and word selection can be found here.

References:

Feasibility and validity of ecological momentary cognitive testing among older adults with mild cognitive impairment

Authors: Raeanne C. Moore, Robert A. Ackerman, Madisen T. Russell, Laura M. Campbell, Colin A. Depp, Philip D. Harvey and Amy E. Pinkham

Year Published: 2022
Read More

Remote Ecological Momentary Testing of Learning and Memory in Adults With Serious Mental Illness

Authors: Emma M Parrish, Snigdha Kamarsu, Philip D Harvey, Amy Pinkham, Colin A Depp, Raeanne C Moore

Year Published: 2021
Read More

Validation of the mobile verbal learning test: Illustration of its use for age and disease-related cognitive deficits

Authors: Raeanne C Moore, Emily W Paolillo, Erin E Sundermann, Laura M Campbell, Jeremy Delgadillo, Anne Heaton, Joel Swendsen, Colin A Depp

Year Published: 2021
Read More

Projects

Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT)

The Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) is a widely used cognitive test designed to assess sustained attention and reaction time. It is the de-facto gold standard for objectively assessing behavioral alertness and very sensitive to sleep loss and circadian misalignment. Furthermore, due to its simplicity, the PVT is not affected by aptitude or practice effects like the majority of other, more complex cognitive tests.

How it works?

The PVT measures response times to stimuli that are presented at random inter-stimulus intervals. The precise measurement of these response times is of critical importance for the validity of the PVT. The test records reaction times, lapses, false starts, etc.

Key Advantages

  • Sensitivity to Subtle Changes:

The PVT can detect even small impairments in attention and alertness.

  • Minimal Practice Effects:

Repeated testing with the PVT does not significantly affect performance, allowing for reliable longitudinal assessments.

  • Ease of Administration:

The PVT is a simple and straightforward test that can be administered in various settings.

Applications of PVT

  • Sleep Research
  • Occupational Settings
  • Medication Research
  • Aging Research
  • Sports and Exercise Science

Web-based PVT by NeuroUX

NeuroUX offers a web-based version of PVT which ca be administered on a smartphone web browser, enabling participants to perform the test on their devices without the need for app installation. The test can be accessed through a simple text message link.

Available Versions:

  • PVT (Standard Version):

This version replicates the traditional PVT with a 10-minute testing duration. It offers comprehensive data on sustained attention and reaction times, making it ideal for in-depth studies.

  • PVT-B (Brief Version):

Our PVT-B condenses the traditional format into a quick 3-minute assessment. While more compact, it retains the core features necessary for meaningful insights, offering a balance of efficiency and precision.

Both versions are accessible via our web-based platform, ensuring seamless integration into remote or in-lab studies.

Why Choose NeuroUX's PVT?

NeuroUX’s platform ensures researchers have the tools they need to conduct precise, reliable, and scalable studies:

  • Web-Based Platform: Cross-platform accessibility without the need for participants to download apps.
  • Accessibility Through Text Messages: Links sent via SMS with options for follow-up reminders.
  • Scalable for Large Studies: Convenient for large-scale studies with participants using personal devices.
  • Different Versions: Standard and brief formats to meet diverse research needs.
  • Integrated Tools: Seamless integration with NeuroUX’s suite of validated cognitive tests, EMA, and wearables.
  • User-Friendly Experience: Designed for simplicity, ensuring participants can easily complete the test without additional guidance.

Recommendations for Research Validity

To ensure reliable data, consider the following:

  • Within-Participant Changes: Ensure that each participant uses the same smartphone for all PVT sessions.
  • Between-Participant Changes: Ensure that all participants use the same smartphone model to standardize response time measurements.

Get Started with PVT

Ready to incorporate the Psychomotor Vigilance Test into your research? Contact us today to learn how NeuroUX’s web-based PVT can enhance your study design.

References:

Maximizing sensitivity of the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) to sleep loss

Authors: Mathias Basner, David F Dinges

Year Published: 2011
Read More

Repeated Administration Effects on Psychomotor Vigilance Test Performance

Authors: Mathias Basner, Emanuel Hermosillo, Jad Nasrini, Sarah McGuire, Salil Saxena, Tyler M Moore, Ruben C Gur, David F Dinges

Year Published: 2018
Read More

Validity and Sensitivity of a Brief Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT-B) to Total and Partial Sleep Deprivation

Authors: Mathias Basner, Daniel Mollicone, David F Dinges

Year Published: 2011
Read More

Response speed measurements on the psychomotor vigilance test: how precise is precise enough?

Authors: Mathias Basner, Tyler M Moore, Jad Nasrini, Ruben C Gur, David F Dinges

Year Published: 2021
Read More

Projects

Quick Tap 1

Quick Tap 1 is designed to assess processing speed and reaction time. Participants are first given a brief animated tutorial where they are instructed to tap a target image as quickly as possible. Once the test begins, the target image is presented at randomized intervals between 1 to 5 seconds. A response is considered correct if the target is tapped within 2 seconds. Responses are considered incorrect if the target is tapped too early or not tapped at all. Immediate feedback can be provided after each trial to enhance engagement and understanding.

Customize:

  • Number of trials.
  • Trial-by-trial feedback given to the participant.
  • Summary feedback given to the participant (e.g., graphical representation of number correct).
  • Participants have the option to mute all sound alerts during the test.

Data collected:

  • Correct count: Total number of correct responses.
  • Incorrect count: Total number of incorrect responses.
  • Reaction time per trial.
  • Fastest reaction time (for correct trials).
  • Median false hits reaction time (for incorrect trials).
  • Median reaction time (for correct trials).

Get Started with Quick Tap 1

Ready to incorporate the Quick Tap 1 into your research? Contact us today to learn how NeuroUX’s web-based Quick Tap 1 can enhance your study design.

Validated:

This test has been validated in a general adult sample and used with several other populations such as adults with serious mental illness.

References:

Initial Psychometric Properties of 7 NeuroUX Remote Ecological Momentary Cognitive Tests Among People With Bipolar Disorder: Validation Study

Authors: Raeanne C Moore, Emma M Parrish, Ryan Van Patten, Emily Paolillo, Tess F Filip, Jessica Bomyea, Derek Lomas, Elizabeth W Twamley, Lisa T Eyler, Colin A Depp

Year Published: 2022
Read More

Assessing Cancer-related Cognitive Function in the Context of Everyday life using Ecological Mobile Cognitive Testing: A protocol for a Prospective Quantitative Study

Authors: Ashley M Henneghan, Kathleen M Van Dyk, Robert A Ackerman, Emily W Paolillo, Raeanne C Moore

Year Published: 2022
Read More

Projects

Quick Tap 2

Quick Tap 2 is designed to assess response inhibition using a classic go/no-go paradigm. Participants start with a brief animated tutorial, where they learn to tap a target image (e.g., a dog) as quickly as possible while avoiding a foil image (e.g., a cat). During the test, images are presented at randomized intervals of 1 to 5 seconds. A response is considered correct if the target image is tapped within 2 seconds. Responses are considered incorrect if the target is tapped too early, not tapped at all, or if the foil image is tapped. Immediate feedback can be provided after each trial to enhance engagement and understanding.

Customize:

  • Number of trials (e.g., can be trial-based or time-based).
  • Trial-by-trial feedback given to the participant.
  • Summary feedback given to the participant (e.g., graphical representation of number correct).
  • Participants have the option to mute all sound alerts during the test.

Data collected:

  • Correct count: Total number of correct responses.
  • Incorrect count: Total number of incorrect responses Target missed count: Number of times the target was not tapped.
  • Tapped too soon count: Number of times tapped before any image appeared.
  • False hits: Number of times the foil was tapped.
  • Reaction time per trial.
  • Fastest reaction time (for correct trials).
  • Median reaction time (for correct trials).
  • Median false hits reaction time (for incorrect trials).

Get Started with Quick Tap 2

Ready to incorporate the Quick Tap 2 into your research? Contact us today to learn how NeuroUX’s web-based Quick Tap 2 can enhance your study design.

Validated:

This test has been validated in a general adult sample and used with several other populations such as adults with serious mental illness.

References:

Initial Psychometric Properties of 7 NeuroUX Remote Ecological Momentary Cognitive Tests Among People With Bipolar Disorder: Validation Study

Authors: Raeanne C Moore, Emma M Parrish, Ryan Van Patten, Emily Paolillo, Tess F Filip, Jessica Bomyea, Derek Lomas, Elizabeth W Twamley, Lisa T Eyler, Colin A Depp

Year Published: 2022
Read More

Assessing Cancer-related Cognitive Function in the Context of Everyday life using Ecological Mobile Cognitive Testing: A protocol for a Prospective Quantitative Study

Authors: Ashley M Henneghan, Kathleen M Van Dyk, Robert A Ackerman, Emily W Paolillo, Raeanne C Moore

Year Published: 2022
Read More

Projects

Memory Matrix

Memory Matrix is a visual working memory task. The task begins with a brief animated tutorial that orients participants to the test. During the test, participants are shown a grid of square tiles. A random selection of tiles are then highlighted for one second. As participants correctly identify the tiles, the difficulty of the task increases. The grid expands in both size and the number of highlighted tiles, starting with a 2x2 grid and progressing up to a challenging 7x7 grid. When a participant gives an incorrect response, the test automatically re-adjusts to the previous level. The test ends after three incorrect responses.

Customize:

  • Option to mute all sound alerts during the test.

Data collected:

  • Correct count: Total number of correct trials.
  • Incorrect count: Total number of incorrect trials.
  • Total score: The sum of the number of highlighted tiles correctly identified on all correct trials.
  • Longest sequence: Maximum number of tiles correctly identified in a sequence.
  • Median reaction time (for correct trials).
  • Fastest reaction time (for correct trials).

Get Started with Memory Matrix

Ready to incorporate the Memory Matrix into your research? Contact us today to learn how NeuroUX’s web-based Memory Matrix can enhance your study design.

Validated:

This test has been validated in a general adult sample, older adults with and without MCI, and adults with psychiatric disorders.

References:

Assessing cancer-related cognitive function in the context of everyday life using ecological mobile cognitive testing: A protocol for a prospective quantitative study

Authors: Ashley M Henneghan, Kathleen M Van Dyk, Robert A Ackerman, Emily W Paolillo, Raeanne C Moore

Year Published: 2023
Read More

Feasibility and validity of ecological momentary cognitive testing among older adults with mild cognitive impairment

Authors: Raeanne C Moore, Robert A Ackerman, Madisen T Russell, Laura M Campbell, Colin A Depp, Philip D Harvey, Amy E Pinkham

Year Published: 2022
Read More

Initial Psychometric Properties of 7 NeuroUX Remote Ecological Momentary Cognitive Tests Among People With Bipolar Disorder: Validation Study

Authors: Raeanne C Moore, Emma M Parrish, Ryan Van Patten, Emily Paolillo, Tess F Filip, Jessica Bomyea, Derek Lomas, Elizabeth W Twamley, Lisa T Eyler, Colin A Depp

Year Published: 2022
Read More

Projects

N-Back

The N-Back Test uses the classic n-back paradigm to assess working memory and cognitive control. The test has two versions: a 1-back version and a 2-back version. The test involves presenting a sequence of letters and asking the participant to indicate whether the current letter matches the one presented n steps earlier in the sequence. The "n" in the test refers to how many steps back the participant needs to compare the current stimulus.

In the 1-back version, participants are instructed to click "yes" if the current letter matches the letter from one step ago. For example, if the first letter is "A" and the second letter is "A," the participant should click "yes." If the first letter is "A" and the second letter is "B," the participant should click "no."

In the 2-back version, participants are instructed to click "yes" if the current letter matches the letter from two steps back. For example, if the sequence starts with "A," "B," and the third letter is "A," the participant should click "yes." If the sequence starts with "A," "B," and the third letter is "B," the participant should click "no," as the letter does not match the one from two steps earlier.

In both versions, participants first view a brief animated tutorial explaining the instructions. Each letter is displayed for 2 seconds, and the trial times out after 5 seconds, requiring a response within that time. The test is typically administered in blocks of 20 trials (i.e., letters).

Customize:

  • Number of blocks and number of trials per block (typically 4 blocks of 20 trials).
  • Option to mute the button click sound during the test.

Data collected:

  • Correct count: Total number of correct trials.
  • Incorrect count: Total number of incorrect trials.
  • Score: Total points earned from correctly identified trials.
  • Median reaction time (for correct trials).
  • Median reaction time (for correct trials).
  • Fastest reaction time (for correct trials).

Get Started with N-Back

Ready to incorporate the N-Back into your research? Contact us today to learn how NeuroUX’s web-based N-Back can enhance your study design.

Validated:

The N-Back paradigm has been extensively studied and has consistently related to frontal function and working memory. Preliminary validation data for the NeuroUX N-Back Test is available here, with additional validation data forthcoming.

Scientific Poster:

Pairing Ecological Momentary Assessments with Mobile Cognitive Tests to Study Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairments.

Authors: Ashley M. Henneghan, FAAN, Emily M. Paolillo, Kathleen Van Dyk, Rebecca Tasker, Raeanne C. Moore

Innovating Solutions for a Changing World